Indivisible and Its Dark Money Roots

The Elections of November 4, 2025, and Indivisible's Role

On November 4, 2025, elections across the United States highlighted the influence of progressive groups like Indivisible. In New York City, Zohran Mamdani won the mayoral race, becoming the first Muslim (crazy yes, especially in NY City) mayor. In Virginia, Abigail Spanberger secured the governorship, defeating Republican Winsome Earle-Sears. These victories, backed by left-leaning organizations, signal a push toward policies that critics say threaten traditional freedoms. Indivisible, founded after the 2016 election, has mobilized supporters through protests and voter drives. However, its funding raises concerns about hidden agendas.

Indivisible's efforts appear aimed at undermining the American Republic by advancing what is considered  counter to traditional American values. This was clear in the "No Kings" protests, where Indivisible rallied against perceived authoritarianism, often targeting conservatives. Such campaigns have influenced urban voters to back left-wing, even Maoist candidates. In Colorado, Propositions LL and MM passed, allowing the state to retain revenue and limit tax deductions for high earners to fund school meals, rather than actually showing fiscal restraint and return funds that were subject to TABOR refunds .

The Colorado Battleground: Propositions LL and MM

Colorado's 2025 election tested fiscal principles under the Taxpayer's Bill of Rights (TABOR). Proposition LL permits the state to keep $12.4 million in excess revenue for free school meals instead of issuing refunds. Proposition MM reduces income tax deductions for those earning over $300,000, directing funds to school meals and possibly SNAP. Both measures passed overwhelmingly by selling the propositions as “for the children”, rather than telling the taxpayers the truth, which is that the legislature was simply irresponsible with the taxpayers money!

Governor Jared Polis and supporters claimed these ensure child nutrition without broad tax hikes. Critics argue they erode TABOR, which mandates refunds for surpluses and voter approval for increases. By emphasizing aid for poor children, campaigns swayed Front Range voters to favor redistribution over discipline. This reflects a communist view where the state controls earnings, contrasting fiscal conservatism's emphasis on individual ownership.

The propositions' success weakens taxpayer protections in Colorado. Out-of-state dark money supported ads portraying opponents as uncaring. Indivisible chapters aided mobilization, aligning with Polis to advance these changes.

The Montrose County Recall: Local Manipulation Exposed

In rural Colorado, the recall of Montrose County Commissioner Scott Mijares illustrates Indivisible's local tactics. Elected in 2024 on conservative principles, Mijares faced recall in 2025 over interpersonal issues, not policies. Voters approved the recall, with 52.05 percent in favor.

Presented as bipartisan, the effort involved convoluted funding to appear local. Investigations link it to networks supported by George Soros's Open Society Foundations. Montrose, a conservative stronghold, was targeted to shift the Board of County Commissioners.

Membership in Indivisible's Montrose/Ouray chapter includes ties to far-left figures, suggesting coordination with Polis's agenda. Despite strong policies, the focus on personality allowed the recall to proceed outside normal elections.

Unraveling the Dark Money Roots: Soros and Beyond

Indivisible's operations rely on funding from George Soros via Open Society Foundations. The foundations provided over $7.6 million to Indivisible. This supported "No Kings" protests, drawing millions nationwide. A $3 million grant aided organizing.

Soros has donated over $140 million to election-influencing nonprofits. In Colorado, dark money groups tied to Polis, like Boldly Forward Colorado, have faced fines for violations. This ecosystem masks influences, allowing Indivisible to pose as grassroots while pushing left-wing goals.

In Montrose, such funding enabled the recall. Similar networks support protests against conservative policies, labeling them extreme.

Broader National Implications

Patterns in Colorado mirror national trends. Indivisible contributed $2.5 million in 2024, with $177,000 in outside spending. Wins for Mamdani and Spanberger show strategies vilifying centrists like Donald Trump.

Soros-linked funding entrenches ideology, from meals to gender sports. Dissent is labeled extremist, and recalls target personalities over policy. "No Kings" rhetoric, backed by millions, accuses conservatives of authoritarianism while seeking control.

Defending the Republic

Indivisible's dark money ties to Soros, evident in 2025 elections, challenge fiscal responsibility and autonomy. From Colorado's TABOR overrides to Montrose's recall, these efforts favor state over individual rights. Transparency is essential to counter disguised extremism and preserve the Republic.