Combating Voter Fatigue:

Aligning our Municipal Elections with November Congressional Elections

Voter fatigue is a growing issue across America, and Montrose is no exception. Constant elections leave many feeling overwhelmed and disengaged. As a dedicated resident and candidate for Montrose City Council, I experience it as well. Why don’t we align our municipal elections with the November congressional schedule in an effort to revitalize civic participation?

The shift would addresses a core problem in our community. Separate April elections dilute focus and turnout, leading to decisions that do not reflect the full will of the people. By consolidating, we streamline the process, saving our precious taxpayer dollars, making it easier for everyone to engage without the burden of multiple voting dates.

The Problem with Low Turnout

Consider the stark reality from our City Clerk's report on the April 2024 municipal election. Only about 3,500 individuals cast ballots out of 17,000 registered voters within city limits. This represents a turnout of roughly 20 percent, far below what we should have for true representation. Low participation results in outcomes that many residents oppose, from policy decisions to resource allocations that fail to prioritize local needs.

Stronger civic involvement fosters a better Montrose. When more voices are heard, we build policies that support families, businesses, and our unique Western Slope lifestyle. Currently, isolated municipal elections in April compete with daily life demands, leading to apathy. Aligning with November harnesses the energy of national races, where turnout often exceeds 50 percent, to boost local engagement.

In our Constitutional Republic, we elect representatives to safeguard our interests. However, abstaining means forfeiting that voice. The question arises: why persist with April elections when November offers clear advantages?

Benefits of Consolidation

Shifting to November delivers tangible benefits. First, it saves taxpayer dollars and YOU and I already strained. Running separate elections incurs significant costs for staffing, printing, and administration. These savings could reduce Montrose's escalating debt or redirect funds to critical city services or community programs that enhance quality of life in Montrose.

Second, it elevates participation. November ballots feature a mix of local, state, and national issues, drawing more voters. This consolidation creates a one-stop civic event, encouraging consistent involvement and ensuring elected officials represent a broader cross-section of the community. Studies from other municipalities show consolidated elections can increase turnout by 10 to 20 percent, leading to more accountable governance.

Questioning the Status Quo

Why does city leadership maintain separate elections? Is there a compelling reason beyond tradition? To me, this change is logical, overdue and is just common sense. It promotes efficiency, inclusivity, and fiscal responsibility. What do you think? Does it resonate with your vision for Montrose?

Michael J Badagliacco, “MJB”

Michael is a father of 5, grandfather of 3, USAF Veteran, recording artist, entrepreneur, Editor of USA Liberty Report, passionate about Freedom, Liberty, the founders’ genius of the Constitution and current Candidate for Montrose City Council.