With Rights Comes Responsibility

Recent events in Minnesota have sparked intense discussions about the nature of rights in America. Through conversations with family, friends, and colleagues, it becomes clear that many have overlooked a key principle: Rights come with responsibility. Rights, which secure the freedoms we cherish, mean actively safeguarding them and exercising them wisely. Without responsibility, rights erode.

In the United States, rights operate as a delicate balance between individual liberties and the common good. Citizens must exercise their rights thoughtfully, or risk losing the freedoms those rights protect. This concept applies across various aspects of life, but it stands out prominently in debates over constitutional rights, such as those protected by the First and Second Amendments.

The Balance of Rights and Responsibility

Rights are not absolute; they demand careful management. When people fail to balance their rights with common sense, society suffers. Responsibility involves recognizing the impact of one's actions on others and the community. For instance, enjoying a right does not mean ignoring potential consequences to the freedoms of fellow citizens.

This balancing act is essential to preserving the rights and freedoms outlined in the Constitution. History shows that unchecked behavior can lead to restrictions on both. By administering rights wisely, citizens help maintain a stable and just society. The recent Minnesota incident highlights how this principle plays out in real life.

The First Amendment in Focus

The Constitution does not guarantee a "right to protest". What is often misconstrued as the right to protest is actually more benign. The First Amendment guarantees the right of the people "peaceably to assemble" and to petition the government for a redress of grievances. This protection allows for gatherings to express views without violence or disruption, preserving the freedom of peaceful expression.

Even the term "peaceful protest" is hypocritical on its own. The words "peaceful" and "protest" are, by definition, diametrically opposed. "Peaceful" implies tranquility and lack of conflict, while "protest" denotes strong objection or dissent, often involving confrontation. True assembly under the First Amendment should remain peaceable, not devolve into actions that impede others or escalate tensions. Exercising this right responsibly means avoiding behaviors that cross into irresponsibility or harm to the freedoms of others.

The Second Amendment in Focus

The Second Amendment, and New York State Rifle & Pistol Assn., Inc. v. Bruen, 597 U.S. 1 (2022), guarantees the individual right to keep and bear arms, a cornerstone of American liberty that protects the freedom to defend oneself and one's family. However, possessing this right is not enough. Individuals must handle firearms responsibly, avoiding indiscriminate use. In the wrong hands or when used irresponsibly, a weapon becomes a danger. When wielded with care, it serves as a tool for self-defense and protection of others.

Personal Note: I believe no permit should be necessary for any law-abiding citizen to carry, as the Constitution states clearly that the right "shall not be infringed". This view aligns with a strict interpretation of the founding document. Yet, even with this right intact, common sense must guide decisions. Rights exist, however, there are consequences to exercising them unwisely that can lead to unnecessary risks and conflicts that threaten the very freedoms they safeguard.

The Minnesota Incident

The case of Alex Pretti in Minnesota illustrates this tension between rights and responsibility. Pretti, a 37-year-old ICU nurse, held a concealed carry permit and carried a weapon during a “protest” against federal immigration operations in Minneapolis. From a constitutional perspective, this action was protected. Supporters emphasize that his permit and the Second Amendment shielded him. But not so fast! Every training for concealed carry includes the responsibility that one who carries has. You are taught to de-escalate every situation, not instigate.

Therefore, a distinction exists between having a right and applying common sense. Protests can escalate quickly, and introducing a firearm heightens tensions. A week prior to the incident, Pretti had an altercation with ICE agents where he was shown being incredibly aggressive. Then, on January 24, 2026, Pretti encountered U.S. Customs and Border Protection agents, leading to his fatal shooting. While the investigation is ongoing, it begs the question: why? Why bring a loaded weapon with two additional loaded magazines to a volatile gathering?

Rights in America thrive when paired with responsibility and common sense. The First and Second Amendments, along with cases like the Minnesota incident, remind us that rights come with responsibilities. Citizens must weigh their actions carefully to avoid endangering themselves or the freedoms of others.

By embracing this principle, individuals contribute to a stronger society. Let the discussions from recent events serve as a reminder, that with rights comes responsibility and preserving our Republic requires nothing less. Balancing the two ensures that both rights and freedoms endure for future generations.

Just one man’s humble opinion.

Michael J Badagliacco, “MJB”

Michael is a father of 5, grandfather of 3, USAF Veteran, recording artist, entrepreneur, Editor of USA Liberty Report, passionate about Freedom, Liberty, the founders’ genius of the Constitution and current Candidate for Montrose City Council.